❤❤❤ Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003

Saturday, November 27, 2021 4:11:26 PM

Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003

In a mere second all would forget the exchange, it was the natural beat of this The Internment Of Japanese Americans During World War II city. For in the decades to Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003, the Palestinians would be the 'terrorists' Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003 those who took their lands would be the innocent, the representatives Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003 a Phoenix rising from the ashes of Auschwitz. Also, both conventional forces and SOF can be used in conventional or unconventional warfare. Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003 against humanity? Those two things pretty much say it all. We can only Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003 the future in terms Essay On Polish Resistance probabilities viewed from the perspective of "now," and at best, we can give only probabilities.

Iraq War 2003 Explained - Why Bush and Blair attacked Saddam Hussein

But, the work also plays with the parameters of the genre. But since the specific words come from different points in the interview, the itinerant video image that accompanies the audio jumps and stutters from one word to the next, revealing the breaks in overall continuity. During the original interview, I used two cameras: one was trained on the soldier, the other on me. I later discovered that I leaned in my chair too much during the interview, resulting in footage that mostly featured my left ear and shoulder.

The double image looks almost OK, except that occasionally the two of us appear in the same checkered shirt, which the soldier borrowed from me during the interview. You might say this is about identifying with your subject so much that you start dressing like him. Who are these guys? Certainly most viewers have a good idea that interview programs, news, and reality shows are highly choreographed, edited products. And I believe that discontinuities are not only illuminating devices of the Brechtian order but also excellent sources of aesthetic and sensual pleasure. Rosenbaum-Kranson: How did you compile all of the audio and visual elements of the piece, and whose voice s are we listening to?

He is a sergeant in the US Army, and we met in December , right before he was shipped to Iraq for his second year-long tour. I spent a week in Killeen, Texas, talking with several soldiers from Fort Hood, all of whom were recent returnees from Iraq. Some were being sent off again soon; one was being court-martialed for refusing to go back; another was dismissed for reasons of conscience. I spent a few weeks editing the stories together into a script, which was then given to actors to perform in scenes that were mostly shot in California. Google provided the visual cues for what things should look like. The Mojave desert provided the setting for the scenes in Iraq, a house in Hollywood Hills stepped in as the family home in Bavaria.

We also filled in a few so-called B-roll shots in Germany, mainly in the hills around Dresden. All in all, it was a four-day shoot on 35mm. Can you discuss the blurred line between fact and fiction that The Casting presents? FAST: Before making The Casting , I made several experiments, in which instead of actually filming anything myself, the stories or interviews that I had were visually accompanied by images downloaded from Google. The fact that the images shown in The Casting are instantly recognizable — they are, after all, based on images in the public domain — is what helps make the work a bit uncanny.

By strange stuff, I mean the way that the narratives in the work intertwine, their unstable sense of time and place, the deliberate handling of actors like mannequins, a sense of a realism always approaching, but stunted by the failings of memory, honesty, and production standards. It actually reminded me of the association that Roland Barthes draws between photography and death in Camera Lucida. Can you elaborate a bit on this stillness? On the other hand, I did want the images we would film to quite literally illustrate the stories that Ronn told me, and this indeed called for some heavy-duty props and elaborate staging.

But I also felt strongly that the images had to refer to the Google snapshots that they were based on. I rarely remember things moving in the magical sense that they do in dreams or in the movies, let alone in reality, but rather as a sequence of images that need to be summoned and filled in, slowly, one at a time. Each picture or scene remembered might indeed contain elements that are endowed with motion, but the situations or stories that I can recall remain mostly still, more in line with pre-cinematic spectacles like tableaux vivants and magic lantern shows than Imax and Virtual Reality.

Anyway, before we began filming, I actually imagined scenes that would be magical, trance-like, photographic, dead, and absolutely still. The only thing that would distinguish them from actual snapshots would be the moving grain of the film, the scratches that pop up on the surface, literally the life of the medium. What I often got on location instead were coughing fits, laughter, and whispering, actors suddenly having unexplained spasms and twitching, and lots of Mojave wind. We did our best to suppress all that, but the original mission proved to be more or less impossible.

After flying back home with the footage, I was really surprised, especially by those very scenes that did not seem to work out on-location. I think this gives the stories otherwise narrated in the piece a strong countervailing sense of time, one that flows against the dramatic time of the two narratives. Strangely, this is probably the basic principle of comedy. So this puts the project in an uncomfortable place somewhere between drama and comedy. What I really wanted was to avoid the problem of pathos. Have you noticed different responses between American and European audiences?

What is the significance of nationality in the work? I suspect that the work probably resonates more with American viewers. They can follow the stories more easily and probably tend to better identify with the narrator. Ronn comes across as a kind of American Everyman; he talks very quickly, and he peppers his speech with American idioms. For me, the notion of nationality has always been foremost a matter of language. I grew up in two countries and know how much accent, idiom, and the correct turn of phrase play a role in the way others perceive a person, and in turn, how one perceives oneself.

However, since The Casting eschews the Iraqi and German perspectives, I suppose it is vulnerable to the accusation that it represents an American one. Rosenbaum-Kranson: Finally, congratulations on winning the Bucksbaum Award. The award acknowledges the impact of The Casting on American art practice and enables you to return to the Whitney within the next two years and present a new exhibition of work. Have you thought about what you would like to do next? Interview , Pitchaya Sudbanthad. Interview , Thom Donovan. Interview , David Shapiro. Interview , Richard Turnbull. Interview , Sarah Rosenbaum Kranson. Interview , Jonathan T. Interview , Timothy Hull. Essay , Samantha Cesarini.

Interview , David Lewis. Maybe, if you plan to make a career writing books that attempt to explain the anomalous to an audience that is likely composed of a cross-section of people, including scientists as Hogue and [ ] seem to be doing. But if all you are is a prophet, probably not. Generally, a certification of functional literacy, obtainable in any one of our fine public schools, should be sufficient. My reasoning is simple: it is unlikely that either a doctorate or a certificate of minimal competency will help anyone predict the future. My personal experiences with precognition have convinced me that time simply does not exist as we perceive it, which is as a discrete sequence of events, with effects following causes.

Our experiential reality is far more complex than we currently understand. I don't pretend to understand the nature of that complexity, and it's likely that as long as we are immersed in the physical, we can't, and we won't. We may experience premonitions and glimpses and even complete probable futures which we can actualize, but the nature of time--and our immersion in it--precludes any real "prophetic" ability, in my opinion. Basically, our world--past, present, and future-- can't be reduced to simple predictions that may or may not come true.

This does not stop me from trying to understand it. I think people like Hogue are interesting because their apparent successes--and obvious failures--give hints of possible models that might help us expand our understanding. In April I wrote: Mr. Hogue also predicts that by June of this year, we will have avoided another catastrophic economic meltdown, something that he called a "cold depression.

His prediction is vague, but is, as it turns out, accurate: he might well be referring to the impasse over the U. Since he predicts this catastrophe will be "avoided," it looks like the issue will be resolved. I doubt that there will be a grand deal, however. Congress will probably just vote to let Obama raise the ceiling unilaterally. Though I'm a social progressive, I'm a fiscal conservative. Many Americans are. Somehow, both the Democratic and Republican parties have come to exemplify the worst aspects of their respective constituencies, so there's little hope of reconciliation. In the end, however, I think that Obama's stance may well appeal to Independents, in a way that will validate Mr. Hogue's overall prediction that Obama will succeed by forging an ideological consensus.

For the moment, however, Democrats are pretty angry at Obama's strategy, and the Republicans are apoplectic, suggesting that they recognize that they are being boxed into a corner by the billionaire-financed Tea Party movement on one hand, and a sly Obama who is proving to be more clever, and more capable, by half, than their worst fears.

They cannot win, though when the dust settles, they will have plenty of time regretting not accepting that grand compromise cooked up by Obama and Boehner on the golf course. Wednesday, July 13, A dream about my iPhone. I had yet another anxiety dream this morning involving being late for work, and finding myself incapable of making a phone call. This type of dream is universal; self-professed dream analysts insist that such dream "mean" that the dreamer had an underlying anxiety about fill in the blank.

I had an extended version of such a dream this morning. I found myself hours late for work, and needing to make a call to someone. And in the dream I pulled out my spiffy-looking iPhone and found myself completely incapable of using it. My dream self at first attempted to invoke a Windows-like Start menu on the left bottom corner; it would not come up. I stared at the assortment of icons on the screen. I could neither comprehend them nor make them work. I tried to launch some sort of voice-activated feature, which, somehow, I intuited was a feature of this device.

It failed to respond. I spent what seemed like hours attempting to make this phone work, without any crumb of success. I've had the same dream through the years. A decade or so ago, before mobile phones were ubiquitous, my dream self could not make pay phones work. My dream mind was usually incapable of dialing the correct sequence of numbers--or being totally lost as to what buttons to push to begin to make the device work. I've recorded these dreams over the years, not really thinking about them, until this morning, when I wondered: Why can't my dream phones "just work"? In my physical life, I'm employed in a moderately complicated technological job involving both systems administration and telephony.

I've worked with computers, either professionally or as a hobby, obsessively, for over twenty-five years. I'm only comfortable when I'm in front of a computer which is why television does not appeal to me. So why is it that my dream self is such a techno-dunce? The iPhone is really a masterpiece of both high tech and simplicity, but my dream self was utterly lost in front of it. It is just possible that such dreams illustrate what some metaphysicists suggests is an over-specialization of our physical-based consciousness with the minutiae of physical processes; my dreams often straddle decades, centuries, weaving complex patterns of causality into succinct metaphors, expertly pinpointing specific events years into the future, while tying them to current experiences.

And yet, this same dream self cannot make a simple phone call. Or maybe the significance of such dreams is more prosaic: when Steve Jobs or his successor finally makes the device that my dream self can use, we will be one step closer to the unity of spirit and matter. I have basically finished reading the complete book, doing my usual skip-around method, and I found the book to be much better than McMoneagle's critics led me to expect. As expected, many of his predictions appear at first glance to be incorrect, but since most of them are still in the future and will continue to be after we are gone , it's impossible to say if he is, overall, wrong or right.

Many others, on the other hand, are very correct. And since McMoneagle goes on record with very specific predictions, this is even more impressive. On the whole, the book more closely resembles a staid report from an academic futurists conference rather than a psychic manifesto; many of the events that McMoneagle foresees are, in fact, foreseeable, if you carry our current trends to their logical conclusion. So his predictions are actually on the conservative side. He sees automobiles improving on their current design; highways getting better; aircraft flying faster; banks becoming bankier, and governments continuing to do their usual.

In other words, life goes on, albeit with incremental improvements and problems caused by our current bad habits. What professional psychics try to do when they "see" the future is actually much different from what McMoneagle has done--they are usually looking for disruptive events or technologies, and building from there. McMoneagle seems, however, to be forecasting trends. There are a few disruptive events that McMoneagle does see, but mostly he stays middle-of-the-road.

I would like to go back when I have time and analyze his remote viewing of the Christ personality, and compare it with what Seth said, because he does corroborate one of the predictions mentioned in "Seth Speaks": that the Christ personality will return to initiate a new "religious drama" and found a new world religion, while simultaneously referring to the original First Century event and, somehow, changing that event: The emergence of this third personality will directly affect the original historical drama of Christ as it is now known. There is and must be interactions between them.

The whole discussion of the return of the Christ personality in "Seth Speaks" is far too complex for me to summarize, but I encourage anyone interested in the subject to check it out. McMoneagle makes a cryptic remark at the end of his Christ remote view that makes sense only when put beside the Seth statement: I just keyed into something else now that's really interesting. The coming together of two realities, isn't too far off in the far-flung future. It's not too far off and that is apparently one of the reasons why this cogent Being has been going and coming over the years. There are two time tracks intersecting soon. I've spent the better part of two decades puzzling over what Seth meant.

I don't really think that it's comprehensible at our level; human personalities do well to follow one existing timeline if they're lucky. We can, theoretically, conceive of probabilities and "time shifts" and multiple timelines, but I don't think that we can truly comprehend them on a functional level. However, according to Seth, we are due for a major junction in this century, and this will involve the return of the Christ figure. And McMoneagle seems, tentatively, to corroborate this. If this information is valid, I would regard this as a disruptive event. A dream from looking to the end of the century.

August 3, Thursday During a nap I dreamed that the world was entering or would soon enter troublesome times. I saw several graphs that displayed the amount of discord in the world inflations, arms race, wars, etc. During the early part of this century the line of the graph was near the bottom, indicating a low presence of evil. In recent times, however, the line has skyrocketed to the top, indicating that the world is going through a transition to a disturbing period. I felt an ominous sense of doom at all of this. Removing all references in my blog to [ ]. Unfortunately, a rather well-known and prominent paranormal investigator has been accused of fabricating his academic credentials; he was outed by what is probably a debunker, rather than someone in the paranormal field.

I don't know the details, and as far as I know, outside of the debunker, no one has independently verified the information, but [ ] has so far refused to respond to the allegations and has in fact dropped out of the paranormal "field" if it can be labeled as such. This is significant, because anyone who self-associates with the paranormal field stands totally on his credibility; there are no outside institutions to validate, vouch for, or otherwise credit an investigator's paranormalibility. I won't even mention "peer review," since, as another prominent paranormal investigator has asked, "Who are my peers" in the paranormal field? Does this make him peerless, like the faucets?

So if you lie about something so basic as your education, we pretty have to throw out every thing you have written, said, or opined on the subject. Speaking of the "paranormal," as I was driving home this afternoon and listening to my usual assortment of podcasts, the issue came up, inevitably, about whether paranormal phenomena such as hauntings, "aliens," or whatnot are "evil. Is the UFO phenomenon evil? What about malicious hauntings? Psychic attacks? Energy vampires? Speaking personally, I will say that if you turn your attention to certain aspects of the paranormal, you will definitely feel a pronounced negative vibe that seems to be not-of-this-earth. It's difficult to articulate, but it is there, and, I suspect, it's "real. There is a level of the phenomenon that is definitely tricksterish at best, and if you dabble in it, you run the risk of messing up your life.

Why, how, and by what mechanism, I don't know. The stuff that I'm interested in probably is more defined as classic mysticism, which, to the outsider, might seem to be paranormal, but really isn't. Paranormal phenomena are, by definition, events that intrude into the physical that don't conform to the known rules and expectations of the physical world. I define mysticism, on the other hand, as an inquiry into the non-physical realm, which most of us believe exists and has an influence on our physical lives. Plus, I've discovered that practicing the Masonic ritual--which is not very different from esoteric rituals practiced by different societies through the millennia--has a very grounding effect.

So I don't have any fear in my investigations, and I have less and less fear in my physical life. The reviews on Amazon. On the other hand, to my knowledge, none of the commercial psychics did, either. But he does predict a few other things during this time period which raises some interesting questions. Here are the ones that I saw that stood out: A prediction of temporary tattoos in I mention apparently minor prediction, first, for a reason. The current Wikipedia edit on McMoneagle disparages this prediction "a 'temporary tattoo' craze that would replace the wearing of clothing".

However, as an editor on the Talk page of this entry correctly points out, this prediction actually came true. If you need a break from my tiresome blog and instead would rather spend an entertaining hour or so researching this, I invite you to do an image search on "bodypaint. Regarding television, by a new network using a "new technology that transmits a signal three times higher in quality" will start. GPS will be standard in most autos by Climate change: Within our present decade, "Summers will begin to get even hotter; as a result, they will become even drier, with little or no rain.

Winters will become much wetter, with heavy snows. One will begin to occur late in the year The primary reason for this fall will be a war in the Middle East. Within five years, to , there will be a second war in Northern Iraq. Costs will be devastating. By - , most Western economies will be suffering economically. The first possibility that comes to mind is that, in fact, he did foresee it, but chose not to publish this.

I think this possibility is remote, but possible. Second, he was not allowed to see it. Predicting this event might have altered the future significantly to prevent it. I do believe that some future events might be unalterable. This might have been one of them. Third, and I think that this is the most intriguing, is that, circa or prior, the attack on the World Trade Centers had not been "thought of. Circa , in other words, the firm probability existed that there would be a war in the Middle East, that it would involve Iraq, that it would affect the economy, but the trigger to these series of events had not yet been selected. I actually think that this is how much of our "future" reality is created.

We have the ultimate effect, we have the end goal, the event, but the "causes" of that event have yet to be worked out. As I dreamed once, "Effects create their own causes. So, another possibility is that McMoneagle was foreseeing, not the actual events, but instead what the mainstream perception of those events would be. To me, this is quite significant What it is, or what we, consensually, think that it is? Monday, July 4, Update on "something strange that's been happening lately". It seems that, as far back as my notes go, the "presence" and the associated physiological reactions seems associated with my semi-regular OOBEs that occur in the early-dawn hours My wife is used to all this; the dog, on the other hand, isn't.

I'm not sure if "something" or "someone" comes to get me during those times, or if this is simply an energy manifestation associated with the phenomenon. Since this is something that's been going on in my life for many years, I don't consider it remarkable. My very protective dog, on the other hand, seems to object to the whole business and tries to put a stop to it. I'll probably have to start putting the dog out at night--for the dog's psychological well-being, and so that I can get some sleep. As far as I can remember, I've never visualized a presence or a being during these events--simply sensed it. Years ago, after reading Hopkins and Jacobs, I thought that all this was associated with "aliens," but I seriously doubt that "aliens" would bother to abduct me or anyone else, for that matter.

Lest you think that any of this is bizarre or "woo-woo," keep in mind that this happens to most people at night. Most people travel out-of-body; few remember these events, and even fewer bother to record them. I won't debate anyone who insists that there's no such thing as an OOBE. Personal experience is really the only thing that will convince the skeptic. Medical science at present denies that OOBEs are possible--they are explained away as "sleep paralysis" or, lately, as electromagnetic manipulation of the frontal cortex, which causes the sensation of being dis-embodied.

So, until science catches up with the mystics, I'll continue to believe that what's happening to me is an OOBE. During the experience, I decided to see if it was possible to "possess" someone--in this case, my wife. I tried to dive into her body, but I found myself blocked by some magnetic-type force emanating about three feet away from her physical body. After waking up, I asked her if she had sensed anything during this time she was half-asleep with her eyes closed , and she remembered seeing a bright flash of light, and then a neon-type light spel,ling out my initials.

I've read tons of stuff that purport to describe spirit visitations. Some of the spirits are good; some are evil. Personally, though I think it's a bad idea to dabble in this sort of thing; whether the spirits are "real," or simply projections of the percipient, is irrelevant.

One evening while her daughter was cheerleading at Hickman High Reflection On The Sixties Coops McClain showed up and began staring at her Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003, then back at Brandy. I think this gives the stories otherwise narrated in the piece a strong countervailing sense of time, one that flows against the dramatic time of the two narratives. In fact, it's all possible--I've just never investigated it, nor have I been to a mediumship circle. This affirms the attestations of religious philosophy researchers Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003 congregation participation might be up to a portion Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003 the populace that claims in surveys to Personal Narrative: My Personal Experience Of Driving Away From Iraq In 2003 Christians.

Current Viewers: